Risk Latte - FE Problem Set #04 Articles Media Education Publications Notes Testimonials
 FE Problem Set #04 Team LatteNov 15, 2005 Problem #1 There are two stocks with prices and . The call option on these two stocks with strike prices and respectively are valued at and . A trader constructs a basket of these two stocks with weights and such that . If the strike price on the basket is and the corresponding call option on the basket is valued at then prove that in equilibrium Problem #2 There are three strike prices , and such that and is a weighted average of and . If , and are three call values corresponding to the three strike prices then prove that: Problem #3 Suppose you want to invest \$100 in a risky asset (such as a stock index) for one year so that you can capture the upside. But at the same time you don't want to lose more than 10% should the risky asset produce poor performance or go down in value. If the asset can only go up to \$125 or go down to \$75 in a year's time (only two outcomes are permitted) and the riskfree rate is 5% then estimate the cost of a protective put option that you should buy (without using any Black-Scholes type solution) to protect your portfolio from going down more than 10%. Will it be a feasible solution? Discuss. Problem #4 A derivative contract has a payoff of the form where is the value of the contract at the origin and is the value of the contract now. Plot the payoff of the contract as a function of . Is the function uniformly convex or is it uniformly concave? What is the gamma of the contract? (Hint: the payoff is very similar to the one that was seen first in a LIBOR squared swap sold by Bankers Trust in the early nineties). Problem #5 An asset price path is governed by a stochastic differential equation of the form where, is a Weiner process and z is a random normal variable such that it has a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. Plot the value of as a function of the random variable on your Excel sheet; what happens when the asset price gets close to zero? If we make a transformation of the form then what would be the corresponding stochastic differential equation for . Under such a transformation what would be the nature of the 'drift' term. Discuss the nature of the random walk in detail for the process . What kind of assets (or asset classes) may follow a random walk such as S and J Discuss. If you need the answers to the above questions then please write to our content editor at info@risklatte.xyz with full details of your name, organization, country,contact phone number(s) and email address. Any comments and queries can be sent through our web-based form. More on FE Problem >> back to top More from FE Problems More from Articles Searching for the Most Beautiful Equation in Finance Where does a Black Swan Come from? Napoleon on Wall Street: Advent of the Stochastic Volatility Models The Remarkable Power of the Monte Carlo Method Mean Reversion and the Half-Life of Interest Rates 